Not rude at all, a fair comment. The RedCat is deeper at 250mm, and after that, youre into 300-400mm territory which pulls galaxies and nebulae even closer. This lens has the Pentax K bayonet mount, and requires the K-EOS adapter for attachment to Canon EOS cameras. A coupe of stage shows, one very recent, and a random collection using this lens exclusively p.s. however i started to realise how every subject might actually be a cardboard cutout being photographed. Thanks for the fine article and the thought you put into it. (For Nikon users there's the new 105mm too.). Wonderful image quality, lots of detail, contrasty, subject separation, fast and accurate AF, bright viewfinder, solid construction, unobtrusive in use, No weather sealing, makes all my other lenses look poor (even the 'L' zooms that, when I first got them, imagined could hardly be improved on). Crazy fast AF! The Rho Ophiuchi Cloud Complex by Eric Cauble using the Samyang 135mm F/2 lens. Given the spot on DPR front page, lots of 'what-lens-should-I-buy' newbies will be spending their money on this one. This free website's biggest source of support is when you use these links, especially these directly to it at Adorama or at Amazon, when you get anything, regardless of the country in which you live. Does the bright star reflection bother you? Definetely the most sharpest lens which I have ever seen. Write your own user review for this lens. Otherwise I might not achieve focus? The image below was captured using a DSLR and 135mm lens on the Sky-Watcher Star Adventurer mount. But she might as well be in front of a green screen. Although typically unused in astrophotography, I did get a chance to see the beautiful bokeh this lens creates when shooting at F/2. I haven't seen compassion with the excellent Zeiss lens you quote (That BTW costs at least 3.5-4 times, yet a good comparison as similar to Zeiss, Samyang believes in providing the exceptional Image Quality, with Manual focus) but compare with Canon's L 135mm F2.0, that by many reviews, is considered as one the best Canon lenses ever made (Not . Based on my handful of experiences with this lens in the backyard, I have found these traits to hold true. (purchased for $1,625), reviewed January 27th, 2010 Some lenses are incurable. No rubber sealing against the camera body tend to give me the creeps when shooting in the wet. I seems many people he are confused about the meaning of the word. Online since 2011, AstroBin is the #1 complete solution for image hosting of astrophotographs. Images that sing. Super sharp and renders beautiful creamy bokeh. Not only does it let you travel light, but impressive wide field projects are often more successful when captured under a dark sky. You're right, but a headshot is exactly where I want to see all those megapixels I bought put to use! It's a trade off. Focus end stop. All content, design, and layout are Copyright 19982023 Digital Photography Review All Rights Reserved. (purchased for $899), reviewed December 9th, 2006 Why take a step back from 250 to sit between the RedCat and the 24-105? But I hardly used it in the 30+ years. Literally it means "blur" so you could just as well use the dictionary definition below the top match from Google search: Bokeh - the visual quality of the out-of-focus areas of a photographic image, especially as rendered by a particular lens. The reason the 135mm lens was that it was the longest lens that would focus with a Leica rangefinder. Depth of field at f/2 on the 135 is so shallow that I usually shot it stopped down to f/2.8 or f/4 anyway. Colour and contrast is great. don't get me wrong; this lens will take great photos, but the 'flatness' i was getting in my photos nearly had me give up 25 years of hobby photography. If so, which one? Rokinon FE14M-C Lens. Then you should have tried the 180mm nikkor ED, the old one, which is the favorite tool of a lot of astrophotographers. Rokinon 135mm F/2.0 ED UMC LensCheck Price (Amazon): https://amzn.to/2MOUFeOExample Images: https://astrobackyard.com/rokinon-135mm-f2-astrophotography/I've . The Rokinon 14mm F/2.8 was the first lens I had ever used like this, and these aspects do not hinder the astrophotography experience whatsoever. Tack sharp even at wide open aperture. We've combed through the options and selected our two favorite cameras in this class. Bokeh == Visual character of the lens optics to render light and color mixing together. It's not a bad lens, probably a great one, even if it doesn't seems really as sharp as a basic 85mm f/1.8 (used at f/2.8) , but it's a bad idea to work wide open if you don't need to. Yes the Samyang is good and yes there are lenses with bad bokeh. Juksu, your point is well taken. A lot of us have been saying this for years. These lenses go about as close as you could get without a dedicated macro lens. How's that for an endorsement? The first telephoto lens of choice, especially recommended for beginners, is the 135mm F2.5 SMC Pentax. You can go lower, but you have to watch your technique. You will see why. You don't have to worry about shopping for a better lens anymore. When you buy a lens with fantastic sharpness and image quality at all apertures, you typically expect it to cost $1,200 on up. Required fields are marked *. I speak Japanese fluently, was a translator in Tokyo for 8 years and studied photography there for two years. Zoom lenses are entirely unsuitable for astrophotography due to prominent aberrations of every kind. Here are our top picks for the canon lenses for astrophotography. The criterion I used in evaluating lenses was optical perfection with no reservations. However, they can be perfectly corrected with narrow band H-alpha or OIII filters. But ppl should know there is much better advice in the forums. Be careful with the focus. It must not be confused with the much cheaper SMC Takumar, often deceptively advertised as SMC Pentax Takumar, which has the M42 camera thread, and is plagued with unextinguishable blue chromatic aberration. A Canon 70-200L IS II at 200mm at f2.8 has all the same characteristics of the Canon 135L. The Samyang 135mm F/2 easily lives up to its hype and should be near the top of your list of purchases if you are new or experienced in the field of astrophotography. Prime lenses are typically lighter as they do not need the additional glass and mechanics required to zoom at varying magnifications. Over the years, I have tried more than two dozen telephoto lenses, until I finally found three or four perfect solutions. Excellent color and saturation, a virtually perfect lens. If you have the 1.8 version, way to go. To fit the Heart and Soul Nebulae in a single frame requires an extremely wide field of view (compared to the magnification of most telescopes). Looking forward to allow purchasing the Canon 200mm f/2.8L II USM. For my purposes, this is a spectacular lens. The EOS R6 II arrives in one of the most competitive parts of the market, facing off against some very capable competition. But this lens changed my mind. BTW, the 300-mm Tele-Tessar you describe -- what camera was it made for? Valerio, I sold my Canon Lens because in Nikon Lens there is a Defocus control option, very usefull in a daylight photos, as portrait. Whatever lens you pick in the end, you will make a great purchase. I would like to make this work with the Nikkor 180mm ED (i.e., what I have versus what I cannot havelol). There was no reason to test any other because, when stopped down to 49mm, F6.1, this lens is simply perfect, comparable to any APO on the market. Find out what happens when Chris shoots some very expired APS film using old Canon and Nikon cameras. I think youll find that this lens is behind some of the most amazing wide-field astrophotography images online! The lens hood is removable (and reversible), which makes packing the Rokinon 135mm away into the included lens pouch possible. Lior, I have done a lot of reading on modern zoom lenses. Ive spent a handful of nights testing this lens in my Bortle Scale Class 6/7 backyard, and my results live up to the hype it gets in terms of astrophotography performance. There are quite a few other excellent lenses out there, and nowadays, quite a few that can be used wide open. reviewed August 2nd, 2017 When i just judge by the indicator line as i click through, it seems like its 19 that gets skipped wondering if there is anything more definite? Contrasty but not harsh. The lens is so crisp that the diaphragm blade pattern is visible on point light sources shot at large aperature. I took a few shots with the lens on my way home after buying it. Film Friday: DPRTV reviews Fujifilm's Acros II film, Fujifilm launches Instax Mini 12 instant camera, DPReview March Madness, vote for your champions, Canon RF 16mm F2.8 STM sample gallery (DPReview TV), OM System M. Zuiko 90mm F3.5 Macro sample gallery, Live from Japan: Highlights from CP+ 2023, Retro Review: 24 years later, the Sony F505 is still pretty cool, Hands on with the OM System M. Zuiko 90mm F3.5 Macro, New FAA rules make it easier for recreational drone pilots to fly in restricted US airspaces, Leica marks James Bond's 60th* with a special edition D-Lux 7, Film Friday: A closer look at the Pentax KX, an original K-mount SLR, Blackmagic Design announces a new Studio Camera 6K Pro, National Geographic selects Pictures of the Year photo contest winner, Sigma brings DC DN APS-C primes to Nikon Z-mount, Panasonic Lumix S 14-28mm F4-5.6 Macro sample gallery, Tamron announces 11-20mm F2.8 ultra-wide zoom for Fujifilm X-mount, Film Friday: DPReview TV steps back in time to shoot APS film, Finer Points: Here's an easy way to improve video autofocus, DPReview TV: One simple fix to improve video autofocus, Head-to-head: Adobe Super Resolution vs. ON1 Resize AI vs. Topaz Labs Gigapixel AI, Waiting for the fishy in the little dishy by Gil Aegerter, Lava Lizard on Marine Iguana by ZimmWisdom. (purchased for $725), reviewed March 26th, 2013 We were surprised by just how much difference there was between these AI-powered image enlargers. This has several advantages from less demanding tracking accuracy, to being able to use a lower ISO setting. Ive set the f-stop to F/2.8, to sharpen up the stars a bit. Tamron has announced its 11-20mm F2.8 Di III-A RXD ultra-wide angle zoom will be made available for Fujifilm X-mount. Lens hood - when I bought this lens years ago the included hood was rather cheap (perhaps Canon has updated the hood) by comparison with other hoods. Well, for me. If you want autofocus and great value for money, buy the Canon 135mm, as it has almost the image quality of the Samyang, and you can get it for under $1,000 new. As you'd expect from a premium prime lens, both maximum and average chromatic aberration is very low across the aperture range, with the maximum CA on the order of 0.02% of frame height regardless of aperture. Asahi Optical's Pentax KX was one of the first cameras with this lens mount, acting as a midrange model in the lineup. I have been following your work both on YT and here from Japan for a while. Even if I wanted a 135mm lens (and the 70-200mm f/2.8 is more versatile) it would be the Nikon 135mm f/2 DC lens. If you shoot things in motion on a Canon body, and need some reach without massive bulk, this is the one I recommend. That's a cheap, fun date for AP. The Precious - sharp images, fast focus, perfect weight, reference-quality build. The thing is, on my APS-C body the 100mm is challenging enough. However, I am convinced that its large aperture and fast F ratio would perform exceptionally well in three color or narrow band H-alpha and OIII photography. Unfortunately, standard photography lenses are generally poorly corrected for CA at the red end of the spectrum, relying on the human eye's poorer resolution in red than green or blue. I've seen several listed but here are more to consider. (purchased for $970), reviewed March 17th, 2011 Every different lens design has different "bokeh" even when the lenses are by specs same, like Canon 135mm f/2 vs Samyang 135mm f/2 are both same, but both render differently, even when both have same DOF. You can barely tell it's a pond.#3: Duck.Birds with bokeh are fine. f/2, fast-accurate-silent focus, (relatively) small & light, super sharp!! If You can afford it, buy it! OK guysTOS rule number one "Posts that are not respectful of other individuals (be they members or not) are not welcome here.". I owned this lens for a long time, then traded it for the 70-200 2.8IS II. Here is a short list of great astrophotography targets to shoot at 135mm with this lens: Below, is an incredible example of the types of projects possible with the Rokinon 135mm F/2.0 lens. On FF I use this lens for both tight portraits and landscape shots. CP+ 2023: Sigma has announced it is bringing its trio of DC DN APS-C prime lenses to Nikon's Z mount: its first lenses for Nikon's mirrorless system. Your images have a chance at remaining sharper once critical focus has been achieved, but now you have lost the extra light-gathering power you wanted. You may need to refocus your subject as the temperature changes throughout the night. This is a fully manual lens, meaning that it does not have autofocus, and you must manually select the f-stop . The few occasions I use a 135 FL usually are landscape shots (where I have no use for f2) and childrens playing (where I need zoom and fast af). Focal length is great. The other one is the inevitable and persistent regret that, because of chromatic aberration, the full 75mm aperture of this beautiful lens can not be used in full visible spectrum photography. Olympus 4x Optical Zoom f/2 Lens; 25-100mm (35mm Equivalent) Show More. That is kind of the point I am trying to make -- These pictures are really not in another league. This includes everything from the rich star fields of Sagittarius, to a complete look at the Andromeda Galaxy. Although your target audience is beginning DSLR imagers, much of your advice also applies to using lenses with CCD cameras. i also have the 300mm f4.5 non ED nikkor which is quite nice . The image is a 90-second exposure at ISO 400 using a Canon EOS 60Da. The 135mm f/2.0 ED UMC Lens for Canon EF Mount from Rokinon is a manual focus telephoto prime lens useful for portraiture and all medium telephoto applications. What's the best camera for shooting sports and action? Stuff I used to take the photos. Image quality, weight and value for money. The following image was captured by Eric Cauble using the Samyang branded version of this lens. f1.4 was a necessisty rather than a creative luxury. Due to the weight, at times I didn't move my shooting position and just zoomed to a composition that worked. (purchased for $800), reviewed March 15th, 2010 A single, 90-second exposure using the Rokinon 135mm F/2.0 ED UMC at F/4. The CA is pretty low wide open and it rivals my 200mm L lens. The 5D's larger pixels also make chromatic aberration somewhat lower at most apertures. The next 200mm lens of excellent quality is the 200mm F4 Nikkor F which requires the Nikon F to EOS adapter. There are a lot of photo/video cameras that have found a role as B-cameras on professional film productions or even A-cameras for amateur and independent productions. You might never need another lens in the overlapping range at 135mm there isn't much difference between the separation afforded by f/2 vs f/2.8, and the latest 70-200s are plenty sharp. I've owned a few L lenses and while their USM motors have always been quick to snap in focus, this 135mm is on a different level. Second of all, the incredible sharpness of the photo: I have owned many lenses, most of which I bought because they were supposed to have world-class sharpness, but the Samyang 135mm still stands out to me. Its nice to have the F/2. F2 allows higher shutter speeds in lower light without raising the ISO. Bottom line, this is just an outstanding lens by any measure, one that makes clear why you'd want to pay the freight for expensive prime glass. This is a stunning lens, clearly one of the very best lenses that Canon produces, this is in the same world class as the 35 1.4, 85 1.2 L lenses. If you must have autofocus, and care about weight, buy the Canon. This lens is very sharp, corner to corner wide open. This thing is a beast in comparison. The downsides of this configuration are that shooting wide open can make focusing difficult. This lens is one of canons finest lenses i have ever used. Zeiss Jena or Oberkochen? It would seem to be a better use of a camera to first look for a suitable background, and then and only then to use bokeh. Now we have to read this kind of ignorant misinformation on DPR articles. http://www.flickr.com/photos/tbrigham/284303834/. So I feel I'm being cheated. There are a total of 8 stops actually written on the lens. Ironically all the sample images in this post are painfully soft. Could use a few updates. Diffraction from the cheap EF-s kit zoom lens was uneven. These lenses can be had on eBay in mint condition for around $70, and are probably the most price efficient optical instrument in the world. Oh and it's stabilised. For portraits and with a high MP body I'd be more inclined than ever to just go 85mm, and for other uses it's hard to pass up the zooms' versatility, but I still there's still room for 135s in some kits and some formats. There have been a lot of Tele-Tessars over the years. And it's not the one problem from my L lenses very sad =(, My favourite lens, hands down. I am a complete amateur at photography in general and this is all new to me so thank you for all the information and videos. The screws should be set sufficiently tightly to prevent shift, yet not so tightly as to interfere with fine focusing. (purchased for $845), reviewed November 16th, 2005 There's just nothing there. When I was on my way home after purchasing my first 135mm lens (the Samyang/Rokinon one) I took a few quick snapshots just to try out the lens. It focuses within a blink of an eye, instantly. tanie i dobre opinie 9 opatek lub Biznes HUMAN Sport Insect Architektura Specjalne Krajobrazy Martwa natura Podry People 2023 Obiektyw o staej ogniskowej See the full-size version on Astrobin. Check out some of the photos he took. With the high megapixel cameras, most people are going to ideally want to shoot at 1/200 or faster. Im a newbie at astro.. and photography in general really! Already wide open this lens produce some high quality photos. It can isolate subject while being tack sharp with beautiful creamy bokeh when used at f2. We sell a wide variety of digital cameras from all the top brands like Canon, Nikon, Sony, Panasonic, Olympus, Fujifilm, Pentax, Leica, Samsung, and more. In photoshop I love to zoom 200, 300 and even 400% to see the extreme details it is an absolutely amazing lens, great backround blur, great for low light weddings with available light. Back in 1999, Sony released the F505, their first digital camera with a Carl Zeiss lens. Weight. If you want the best value possible for your money, and can survive without autofocus, buy the Samyang. It allows to push your main subject matter into abstraction wide open and get very detailed images stopped down. In the highest contrast situations there's a hint of both purple and green fringing but both are minor and easy to remove with software. From far to near, the AF is instantaneous. These are affordably available on eBay, and result in perfectly round star images, the way nature intended them to be. So.. its like there is one F stop not being used by the lens..how do you know what click is for what F stop?? The shot of the cat could certainly be improved through cropping, though. Fast focus, Super sharp, Well built, Awesome for low light. If you have pictures taken using the Rokinon 135mm F/2 lens, please feel free to share your results in the comments section (links to Astrobin, Flickr or your personal gallery are fine). Some people do not like this and consider Bokeh to refer only to the rendering of out of focus points of light. All lenses mentioned below are adaptable to Canon EOS cameras with slim EOS adapters which allow the lenses to focus just slightly past infinity. By the way, I still enjoy using my very sharp Sears 135mm, PKA mount lens. The Rokinon website lists this lens as being useful for portraiture photography, and most telephoto applications. Recently, the FAA announced that recreational drone pilots in the USA can request LAANC authorization to fly in controlled airspace at night. This seems to be the norm for telephotos. But the Rokinon f/2 version fits into a different market. f2, very sharp, virtually without CAs, contrast, colour, lightwight, buildings. Over the last ten to fifteen years excellent apochromatic telescopes have become available for visual use and photography. At 135mm, you can get really creative about the object or objects you shoot and where you position them within the frame. They just wanted to increase their joy from photography. BirdDog P240 40X NDI PTZ Camera. Andysea, those are great images on your website. In my test, nikon have the same color correction than Canon and same sharpness. Focusing should be done on moderately bright stars using the 10x magnified Live View. The aesthetic quality of the blur in the out-of-focus parts of the image are buttery smooth and soft. But you are talking more than 2x crop (cut half by width and height) and that leaves you to twice smaller resolution == quarter of the Mpix count. Aside from being much more affordable, telephoto lenses are easier to transport, easier to mount and easier to guide, and are much more likely to produce encouraging results to a beginner. In fact, in my test shots, I noticed that the red channel was a little softer than green and blue. Yes, there is some sharpness added when stopping down to f4 or f5.6 but after that it doesn't get better. The lens shows a very slight pincushion distortion, but it's well under 0.1% of frame height, an excellent performance by any measure. Now I wonder why people are never happy even on 3rd day of a new year :) Come on guys just think "Micael Widell" was working over holiday period to publish this free article ;). If you can afford it buy this lens, you will love it. In this buying guide we've rounded-up several great cameras for shooting sports and action, and recommended the best. It could easily rival 'bokeh monsters lenses' at fraction of their price. Testing on an EOS-5D, we see that it's sharpness is almost as good wide open in the corners as on the EOS-20D with its smaller sensor. Add To Cart. It's not the most versatile lens, but it's very great for tight portrait shoots; background blur is creamy IMO; one of the best 'bokeh' lens. The inset picture is a magnified view of the bottom right corner of the frame. Perfect lens on the same level as CZ! Did anybody use this lens for DSLR astrophoto? Just like the above samples, most are just bad. ", I'd no problem with that. This photo was captured with the Samyang 135mm F/2 lens using a UV/IR cut filter and a QHY168C dedicated astronomy camera. This lens flares easily and the flare can be especially ugly if a sun or flash are in the frame. Sure, not all 135mm lenses are lightweightSigma's new 135mm F1.8 is rather heavy at 1130gbut if you look at the Samyang 135mm F2, which is pretty much flawless optically, it weighs only 830g. I'm not a fan of the large hood. Preaching to the choir! This lens is available on Amazon for most camera bodies. Backwards compatible (film). Just place your subject against a distant background, and half of the job is done. I have found myself shooting wide open almost all the time. The 135mm f2.8 in particular can take amazing photos of the brighter deep sky objects with about 1 second time . So I sold it for nearly what I bought it for and chalked it up to a learning experience. But like a glitch in the matrix, an anomaly that shouldn't exist, you can get the Samyang/Rokinon 135mm for as little as $430 brand new. While some people LOVE the bokeh circles (first photo), others hate them and consider them a distraction.The 50mm f/1.8 is hardly a lens to talk about. I would love to see his test images. I'll walk you through all this inc. It actually makes my eyes water as I try to resolve how bad the blurriness is. Available 03/21/23. Along with improvements in telescope mounts, camera technology, filters, and digital image processing, these have allowed amateurs to produce astrophotographs of nearly professional quality. For some objects a reflection can take away from the photo because it covers interesting details of the object (Think Alnitak in the Horsehead Nebula). The extremes are 2 and 22. I loved the Nikon 80-400G for a year, or so, and then found everything with it wrong, and got rid of it. Part of it might be that they were designed for film photography and modern digital sensor are far more demanding in terms of optical quality. Voting ends March 8, 2023. Instead it means the style of rendering. Yuri toropin tests a bunch of lenses on Flickr which is a great source. Lots of wet blankets around here. Sigma 105/2.8 DG EX Macro (very sharp at infinity) This is the EF-M series version. With todays huge variety of digital sensors, each with their own characteristics, in-camera and post-processing etc., much depends on the given combination of your photo gear to create a certain effect. But If you want the "look" you get with a medium telephoto at f/2, hen all those negatives become irrelevant. Manually focusing a lens for astrophotography is nothing new, but the manual aperture ring adjustments may feel a little strange at first. I know taste is subjective, but it seems to me that some people have become obsessed with blur and bokeh. And they like circles (no ellipses or polygons) and smooth colour (no hard edges, no onion rings). When stopped down to 37mm, at F5.4, it also produces perfect, small and round star images across the entire field. I am still very proud of some of the photos I shoot with a Pentax O450 15 years ago - a good smartphone camera today is at least as capable. I've missed shots at wide apertures because the DOF is so extremely thin. This is actually worse than just plain obsession with blur. Seems like a great lens. Finally, although we don't explicitly test for it, we have to note that this lens' bokeh (rendering of out-of-focus objects) is really excellent as well.
Elmo Voice Changer,
Pepsi Project Report On Marketing Pdf,
Government Grants For Cemetery Restoration,
Teamehub Employee Login,
Articles C